{"id":60,"date":"2013-04-24T17:06:30","date_gmt":"2013-04-24T22:06:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.axharrell.com\/blog\/?p=60"},"modified":"2015-02-11T17:07:37","modified_gmt":"2015-02-11T23:07:37","slug":"atalanta","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.axharrell.com\/blog\/atalanta\/","title":{"rendered":"atalanta and the lion"},"content":{"rendered":"

Atalanta (noun): A huntress who would marry only someone who could beat her in a foot race. She was beaten when a suitor threw down three golden apples, which she stopped to pick up[1]<\/a>. According to Greek mythology, Atalanta\u2019s father left her to die on a mountaintop, for she was not the son he had desired. Legend has it that bears cared for Atalanta until hunters had found her. She was raised in the wilderness, apart of a wild pack of family bears. Atalanta was a fierce and female and happy huntress who was utterly uninterested in men; she took an oath of virginity to the goddess Artemis. Her father eventually returned to his daughter and demanded she wed, despite her lack of desire for marriage. A game was thus proposed. A competition. Those who lost to her in the foot race would be killed. The winner? Her husband. With help from the goddess Aphrodite, a young man Hippomenes was given three golden apples to roll on the ground during the race; slowing Atalanta down, for they were irresistible to her. Zeus turned the couple into lions after they made love in once of his sacred temples. Other legends say Aphrodite turned them into lions because they didn\u2019t honor her. Lions could not mate within their own species \u2013 only with leopards. Atalanta and Hippomenes would never be together again. Underhandedly, Atalanta was given the opportunity to once again be alone in the wild. Returned to her independence. Free.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u201cHonestly, a couple of years ago I don\u2019t think I would\u2019ve had the balls to do this,\u201d curator Claire Molek, 23, stated, regarding her exhibit\u00a0Atlanta and the Lion<\/i>, opening March 23rd<\/sup>\u00a0in the River North gallery HAUSER Gallery. The gallery\u2019s mission statement articulated their \u201ccarefully curated exhibition space\u201d as a place of \u201cdedication to the service of the consciousness\u201d that \u201cstrives to provide an open, accessible and hospitable environment.\u201d Marc Hauser and Molek \u2013 co-owners \u2013 believe the gallery to be one that \u201cserves both the contemporary discourse and the public at large.\u201d The fourth exhibition; third of complete emerging works and artists; is in response to the German painter Georg Baselitz\u2019s recent criticism of women artists.<\/p>\n

Atalanta and the Lion featured work by several emerging artists: Meryl Bennett, Anita Brathwaite, Gracie Hagen, Julia Haw, \u201cMeredith and Anna\u201d and Brittany Southworth-LaFlamme. The \u201crisky exhibit\u201d \u2013 as Molek described it \u2013 exposed vast dimensions of color radiating off the white walls; various shades of black were illuminated from the art pieces to the brassieres\u2013 yes, the brassieres\u2013 to the drinks and dresses. Photographs, film, oil paintings, sculptures and mixed media were abundantly placed within the gallery, each corner twist leading to show off a different artist\u2019s work.<\/p>\n

\u201cI was honestly a little hesitant to do this show because I didn\u2019t want to come off as a militant feminist,\u201d Molek said. The remark and idea that women cannot paint surprised the curator, who has an extensive and impressive resume and remarkable artistes on speed dial. \u201cI started to realize I had never made an effort to seek out women artist, and I started to realize that that was sort of my responsibility in a way,\u201d she expressed. \u201cWhere I come from, in terms of my ideology, is that I think that othering is completely trite and actually it actually a disservice to our civilization. When we put people in categories, I think that that sort of diminishes the quality and value of their work. That being said I think that not acknowledging that we have \u2013 that we are \u2013 that we have been othered would sort of be a mistake.\u201d With that being said, Molek has the power to express the flaws in such statements \u2013 yet her hesitancies were not superficial.<\/p>\n

\u201cI had a lot of clients walk in and they were all so excited about the work that was on the wall and then they walked back and saw his work and walked right out,\u201d she explained. Being in River North, The HAUSER Gallery and their expected customers may not quite grasp the significant art value in the \u201crisky\u201d work that will be presented in\u00a0Atalanta and the Lion<\/i>. \u201cI showed work that is really sort of in your face, with its sense of nudity,\u201d Molek said. \u201cTo say it bluntly, it\u2019s a bunch of naked people wearing costume and it\u2019s really funny and whimsical and I feel like when I saw it\u2026 It was like this sense of liberation for me.\u201d<\/p>\n

Molek fundamentally believes that art is about consciousness. Progressing that said consciousness and expanding it to the public at large is a basic foundation for\u00a0Atalanta and the Lion<\/i>. A basic foundation for art. The significance of the exhibition was enough to keep the basement packed all night with various photographers and reporters representing the Chicago art scene. Families and friends and fans were abundant, as well as those who were coming to see their former student\u2019s work and those who were across the street, intrigued by the welcoming and intelligent gathering outside smoking cigarettes and taking pictures. From the street, the gallery is visible: underneath the staircase entrance is the ascetically light, packed, designed basement where the reception was held.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen I say risky, I mean work that I\u2019m not sure is going to sell.\u201d Molek laughed. \u201cI guess I sort of just have something in me, I like to be incendiary. It fun thing for me. I like to show work that sort of pushes the limits of what we expect at an art show.\u201d Regardless of the potential lack of understanding, Molek expressed her utter excitement\u00a0Atalanta and the Lion<\/i>\u00a0with such wide eyes, comparable to a scientist. \u201cI love this show because I really feel like this is first show that I\u2019ve ever done that was really in protest of anything,\u201d she concluded.<\/p>\n

Molek has been involved with the Chicago gallery scene for five years, she said during an interview a few weeks prior the opening of\u00a0Atalanta and the Lion<\/i>. \u201cI don\u2019t have a cent to my name. And that\u2019s okay, I\u2019ll keep doing this because I know it\u2019s possible\u201d she said, validating her substantially authentic passion to wake-up the art district and not necessarily create change, but invoke the concept of it. \u201cI think that the more that we are able to sort of change the way we look at art, the better service we\u2019re doing to the community.\u201d<\/p>\n

Emerging artists Julia Haw, 30, and Gracie Hagen, 25, were also present at the interview \u2013 deliberating their individual and outspoken responses to worldwide, collective obstacles. If\u00a0Atalanta and the Lion<\/i>\u00a0wasn\u2019t an obvious definition for what the particular social issue Molek brought to attention, the exhibit was comprised solely of women artists; participating in a conversation that previously wasn\u2019t accepting their opinion, as Molek described. \u201cI didn\u2019t want to make the mistake of categorizing these women as women artists. More than anything, I think their work is about the discourse; it\u2019s contributing to the white mans discourse, it\u2019s contributing to the discourse in a way that is in no way saying, \u2018My work is about being a women artist,\u2019 and that is something I thought that they all shared and something that needed to be highlighted and shared with the community in a very serious way,\u201d she continued.<\/p>\n

The centerpiece of\u00a0Atalanta and the Lion<\/i>\u00a0was an accurate depiction of what Claire meant by \u201crisky\u201d \u2013 Haw\u2019s 48 inches by 48 inches oil painting\u2019s title choice of\u00a0Power Pussy\u00a0<\/i>is enough to prove this. Haw\u2019s pieces are usually always accompanied by an essay, as Molek explained, with this essay entitled, \u201cAll-Pervasive Sexism and How That Has Anything to Do with Face Creams.\u201d The oil painting, completed this year, features a woman from the neck down kneeling, leaning forward into an array of red roses \u2013 completely nude. The uninviting, harsh black backdrop has dried corn stalks geometrically placed around the female.\u00a0 Her body is porcelain and illuminated, literally elucidating the metaphorical intentions of the painting by coming forward, out of the darkness and developing into the deep red roses. Haw\u2019s essay offers the logic and reasoning behind her quite controversial and, well, naked painting, as well as social norms that aren\u2019t what she believes to be acceptable. Haw provides several cases of sexism in American culture that had taken place within the last year with concrete statistics and sources. She isn\u2019t kidding around.<\/p>\n

Julia Haw is a fundamental example of what it means to be a bad-ass artist in today\u2019s society; with blunt bangs, wide, blue eyes and killer heels, it\u2019s hard to look at her without imagining what is going on in that head of hers. Or, what isn\u2019t going on. Haw\u2019s thick thought process boils down to sincere passions to reform our culture. \u201cMy goal with my work, ultimately, is to take a certain concept or idea or something I\u2019m really heavily researching and making it an easily digested pill with candy coated colors and drawing the viewer in,\u201d she \u2013 quite intelligently \u2013 said, aware that her articulations are not always correctly comprehended. \u201cThere\u2019s definitely a larger message behind the work,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

When deciding to participate in\u00a0Atalanta and the Lion<\/i>, Haw remarked, \u201cClaire kind of pushed me and I was like, \u2018Hell yeah I want to do this show!\u2019 And the more I sat down and researched just the past year of sexist cases and also looking at social norms that exist around me, being very forthright and factual, I started thinking about how I feel as a thirty year old women in a contemporary society.\u201d The disclaimer portion of the essay that enlightens\u00a0Power Pussy<\/i>\u00a0rings true to this thought process. Haw spends a decent amount of time clarifying her beliefs within the disclaimer, giving the rest of the composition a clear, logical and indisputable flow. She told you why she thinks what she thinks, and then applies her beliefs to her work. Quite ironically simplistic and blunt, much unlike the passionate oil art the paper is concerning. \u201cWhen I wake up in the morning and I notice a new wrinkle and I\u2019m using all these anti-aging creams. And I\u2019m wondering what my \u2018cap on beauty\u2019 is and when my \u2018flower is going to wilt\u2019 and all of these descriptors. I\u2019m thinking of all of these things, and how these thoughts got into my head, you know? I\u2019m not just pulling them from no where,\u201d she explained.<\/p>\n

According to her essay, Haw states that we, Americans, are products of culture and society \u2013 that there\u2019s a clear link between our actions and our environment. Gender divides are still prevalent because equality still isn\u2019t a firmly grasped concept, especially within the terms of the\u00a0human race<\/i>, not just men and women. Instead of generating just a list of reasons that are wrong within our society and extensive examples of just how sexist our consumption culture is, Haw questions. She questions why these things are happening, how they began, and why it\u2019s socially acceptable to do so. A step further, Haw answers some of those questions, within her masterpiece. \u201cI\u2019m creating this piece, not only about the power and strength in feminine beauty and feminine sexuality, but it\u2019s pointing a direct finger as how society views women and sexism. Like saying a women\u2019s peak beauty is 30? I mean, come on. Who creates these studies and for what?\u201d Haw remarked. \u201cSo the piece is pretty loud, and it\u2019s a direct finger a lot of the views people have at women and equating to a women\u2019s sexuality as being her number one tour-du-fluers,\u201d she established. Her disclaimer rational within the essay concludes with final and penetrating propositions; \u201cIt is imperative we examine our underlying social commentary, humor and structure, as this reveals why women are wrought with these thoughts. This sexist pervasiveness in our culture exists as subconscious suggestion and comes back to my daily individual self-view.\u201d<\/p>\n

Other than just answering these questions within her art and creatively, Haw bluntly establishes what our culture doesn\u2019t need, and why, in words. She believes we do not need denial, acceptance, over the top expectations and tasteless attempts at change. \u201cHow are freedom cries written across a woman\u2019s chest more effective than a well written article? They are certainly attention grabbing, but the cigar smoking misogynist isn\u2019t going to be moved, except in his pants,\u201d she wrote. She insinuates solutions: Awareness, accepting the lack of acceptance, embracing yourself and accepting an individual, unique path.<\/p>\n

Her essay concludes with \u2013 if it wasn\u2019t apparent enough through her disclaimer, problems, solutions and the work itself \u2013 a blunt \u201cthis is what you should\u2019ve gotten out of my work, but if you didn\u2019t, here\u2019s what you missed\u201d avant-garde bullet-points of\u00a0Power Pussy.<\/i>\u00a0Her reason why. She acknowledges the possible assumption of topically misogynistic aesthetics before quickly and effectively explaining how wrong that assumption is. \u201c[Power Pussy] is firstly a celebration of the sensuality, power and beauty inherent in every woman. The woman\u2019s head is of no importance, in effort to best emphasize her sex and sexuality. Her body is positioned to display equal amounts of vulnerability and courage,\u201d she wrote. \u201cIt calls attention to the \u2018societal gaze\u2019 of a woman and the utterly detrimental view that a woman\u2019s sexuality, and especially youth, equates her overall societal worth. Roses exploding from her vagina, in all at their height of color, health and peak beauty, exemplify this. These roses are contrasted with dead, dried, and rotting cornstalks in the background, meant to represent aging and ageism. The gold Lady Liberty coins and dollar bill rosettes represent the richness of a woman, but also the use of sex for worldly gain and advancement,\u201d she concluded. The immense crowd surrounding the painting for all three hours of the opening reception had nothing but wide eyes and acceptance; the essay \u2013 befittingly — seems to be for those who are exactly what our culture doesn\u2019t need. Maybe\u00a0Power Pussy<\/i>\u00a0will help.<\/p>\n

Refreshments were served opening night by Journeymen Distillery, displaying an array of whiskey and wine and also water \u2013 if requested. The reception began at 6pm and was intended to conclude at 9pm. Whispers of an after-party began as the night continued and the crowd mushroomed. The avant-garde and idiosyncratic exhibition was intense, to be blunt. Renegade Lingerie offered bra-fittings in \u2013 ironically \u2013 a concealed and modest corner of the gallery. Underwear was available for purchase, as well as the opportunity to have the exact dimensions of your chest translated into every definition possible. The variety of cup-sizes given was equally embarrassing as empowering. The exhibit will run until the 2nd<\/sup>\u00a0of May at 230 W. Superior, open 11am to 5pm Tuesday through Saturday.<\/p>\n

The mythological creature Atalanta is the quintessential, quasi-feminist badass. Claire Molek and Julia Haw rank pretty highly with Atalanta; Chicago\u2019s art-based and utter furor, badass Atalantas. Bare. Uninhibited.<\/p>\n


<\/p>\n
\n
\n

[1]<\/a>\u00a0The New Oxford American Dictionary<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Atalanta (noun): A huntress who would marry only someone who could beat her in a foot race. She was beaten when a suitor threw down three golden apples, which she stopped to pick up[1]. According to Greek mythology, Atalanta\u2019s father left her to die on a mountaintop, for she was not the son he had … Continue reading atalanta and the lion<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[18,17],"tags":[27,30,28,20],"class_list":["post-60","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-interview","category-journalist","tag-27","tag-freshman-year","tag-journalism","tag-student"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/s5HHH1-atalanta","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.axharrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.axharrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.axharrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.axharrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.axharrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.axharrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":61,"href":"https:\/\/www.axharrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60\/revisions\/61"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.axharrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.axharrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.axharrell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}